Cross-Framework Mapping

BCBS 239vsEASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BCBS 239 maps to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation with 24% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCBS 239: Information Security Governance(3 mappings)

BCBS239-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management(6 mappings)

BCBS239-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management
BCBS239-19Concentration risk management3 targets
IS.D.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.210Information Security Risk Treatment
IS.I.OR.220Information Security Risk Management

BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting(9 mappings)

BCBS239-22Incident response and containment3 targets
IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
IS.I.OR.225External Reporting
BCBS239-24Customer notification procedures3 targets
IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
IS.I.OR.225External Reporting
BCBS239-25Post-incident review and improvement3 targets
IS.AR.215Information Security Incident Response
IS.D.OR.225External Reporting of Information Security Events
IS.I.OR.225External Reporting

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between BCBS 239 and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 6 map directly to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

19 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.