TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Azure Security BenchmarkvsSSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)

See exactly how Azure Security Benchmark controls map to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Azure Security Benchmark maps to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) with 16% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Azure Security Benchmark controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Infrastructure Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

ASB-01Shared responsibility model definition
→RM-3Monitoring of Controls

Azure Security Benchmark: Identity & Access in Cloud(1 mappings)

ASB-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→ITGC-4Program Development

Azure Security Benchmark: Data Protection in Cloud(1 mappings)

ASB-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→ITGC-3Computer Operations

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(1 mappings)

ASB-24Cloud change management
→ITGC-2Change Management

Related Comparisons

Other Azure Security Benchmark comparisons

Azure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-14520 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs MTCS (Singapore)20 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701720 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs C5 (Germany)20 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-14620 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISMAP (Japan)20 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-19020 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701820 mappings

Other SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) comparisons

SSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)8 mappingsUS ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsUK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsSOC 2 vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)6 mappingsNotifiable Data Breaches Scheme (Australia) vs SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Azure Security Benchmark and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

Azure Security Benchmark has 25 controls across its framework, while SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Infrastructure Security, where 5 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) equivalent.

How many controls map between Azure Security Benchmark and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

Of 25 total Azure Security Benchmark controls, 4 map directly to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Azure Security Benchmark to SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

21 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct equivalent in SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR). The highest concentration of gaps is in Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Infrastructure Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Azure Security Benchmark and SSAE 18 SOC 1 — Report on Controls at a Service Organisation (ICFR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Infrastructure Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.