Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

144
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
100%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27001:2022 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 100% coverage across 63 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Application Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 63 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 144 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Security Foundations(20 mappings)

SEC01-BP01Separate workloads using accounts4 targets
→iso-27001-2022::5.23Information security for use of cloud services
→iso-27001-2022::5.3Segregation of duties
→iso-27001-2022::8.22Segregation of networks
→iso-27001-2022::8.31Separation of development, test and production environments
SEC01-BP02Secure account root user and properties2 targets
→iso-27001-2022::8.2Privileged access rights
→iso-27001-2022::8.5Secure authentication
SEC01-BP03Identify and validate control objectives4 targets
→iso-27001-2022::5.1Policies for information security
→iso-27001-2022::5.31Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements
→iso-27001-2022::5.36Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
→iso-27001-2022::8.26Application security requirements
SEC01-BP04Stay up to date with security threats and recommendations3 targets
→iso-27001-2022::5.6Contact with special interest groups
→iso-27001-2022::5.7Threat intelligence
→iso-27001-2022::8.8Management of technical vulnerabilities
SEC01-BP05Reduce security management scope
→iso-27001-2022::5.23Information security for use of cloud services
SEC01-BP06Automate deployment of standard security controls3 targets
→iso-27001-2022::8.27Secure system architecture and engineering principles
→iso-27001-2022::8.32Change management
→iso-27001-2022::8.9Configuration management
SEC01-BP07Identify threats and prioritize mitigations using a threat model3 targets
→iso-27001-2022::5.8Information security in project management
→iso-27001-2022::8.26Application security requirements
→iso-27001-2022::8.27Secure system architecture and engineering principles

+124 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to ISO 27001:2022 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27001:2022 controls your existing AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into ISO 27001:2022 lands at 36.6%, while ISO 27001:2022 into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar lands at 54%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar evidence buys you for ISO 27001:2022, the other asks the reverse.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into ISO 27001:2022
36.6%

34 of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. 59 are genuine gaps.

ISO 27001:2022 into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
54%

34 of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27001:2022. 29 are genuine gaps.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to ISO 27001:2022
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27001:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and ISO 27001:2022?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 63 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 93 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 63 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Application Security, where 0 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 63 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 63 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to ISO 27001:2022?

0 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Application Security with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Application Security (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.