TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
64%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 64% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Part 4: Remedies and Penalties(3 mappings)

AT-DSG-10Section 29 - Liability and right to compensation / civil jurisdiction
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
AT-DSG-12Section 62 - Administrative penalties
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Part 5: Implementation of the Law Enforcement Directive(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-2Section 2 - Scope and application
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)
AT-DSG-6Sections 12-13 - Image processing (video surveillance/CCTV)
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

Part 3: Data Protection Authority(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-7Section 18 - Establishment of the Data Protection Authority
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
AT-DSG-8Section 22 - Functions and powers of the DPA
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Related Comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20229 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs Spain Organic Law 3/2018 on Data Protection and Digital Rights (LOPDGDD)9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs TEFCA - Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs Azure Security Benchmark9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 (NDPA)8 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs Nebraska Data Privacy Act8 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs South Korea PIPA8 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 701 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions, where 3 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 14 total Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls, 9 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

5 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.