Cross-Framework Mapping

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)vsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)

See exactly how Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls map to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
64%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) maps to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) with 64% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 414K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 414K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Part 4: Remedies and Penalties(5 mappings)

AT-DSG-10Section 29 - Liability and right to compensation / civil jurisdiction
FDBR-ControllerObligations-DPA-NoticeController + Processor Obligations + Data Protection Assessments (Fla. Stat. 501.707, 501.708, 501.71, 501.711)
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)3 targets
FDBR-ControllerObligations-DPA-NoticeController + Processor Obligations + Data Protection Assessments (Fla. Stat. 501.707, 501.708, 501.71, 501.711)
FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)
FDBR-SensitiveData-Children-VoiceFacialSensitive Data, Children's Privacy and Voice/Facial Recognition (Fla. Stat. 501.711, 501.1735)
AT-DSG-12Section 62 - Administrative penalties
FDBR-ControllerObligations-DPA-NoticeController + Processor Obligations + Data Protection Assessments (Fla. Stat. 501.707, 501.708, 501.71, 501.711)

Part 5: Implementation of the Law Enforcement Directive(6 mappings)

AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing3 targets
FDBR-ControllerObligations-DPA-NoticeController + Processor Obligations + Data Protection Assessments (Fla. Stat. 501.707, 501.708, 501.71, 501.711)
FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)
FDBR-SensitiveData-Children-VoiceFacialSensitive Data, Children's Privacy and Voice/Facial Recognition (Fla. Stat. 501.711, 501.1735)
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing3 targets
FDBR-ControllerObligations-DPA-NoticeController + Processor Obligations + Data Protection Assessments (Fla. Stat. 501.707, 501.708, 501.71, 501.711)
FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)
FDBR-SensitiveData-Children-VoiceFacialSensitive Data, Children's Privacy and Voice/Facial Recognition (Fla. Stat. 501.711, 501.1735)

Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-2Section 2 - Scope and application
FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)
AT-DSG-6Sections 12-13 - Image processing (video surveillance/CCTV)
FDBR-Enforcement-AG-CurePeriodEnforcement by Florida Department of Legal Affairs + Penalties + 45-Day Cure (Fla. Stat. 501.72, 501.721, 501.722)

Part 3: Data Protection Authority(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-7Section 18 - Establishment of the Data Protection Authority
FDBR-ControllerObligations-DPA-NoticeController + Processor Obligations + Data Protection Assessments (Fla. Stat. 501.707, 501.708, 501.71, 501.711)
AT-DSG-8Section 22 - Functions and powers of the DPA
FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)

Related Comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Other Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (414K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)?

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions, where 3 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) equivalent.

How many controls map between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)?

Of 14 total Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls, 9 map directly to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)?

5 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR). The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.