TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)vsAustralian Privacy Principles (APPs)

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls map to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
64%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) maps to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) with 64% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security (Schedule 2).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

CDR Rules Obligations(6 mappings)

AUCDR-OB-2Consent requirements2 targets
→APP-3APP 3 - Collection of solicited personal information
→APP-5APP 5 - Notification of the collection of personal information
AUCDR-OB-3Data minimisation
→APP-3APP 3 - Collection of solicited personal information
AUCDR-OB-4CDR policy publication
→APP-1APP 1 - Open and transparent management of personal information
AUCDR-OB-5Deletion or de-identification of redundant data
→APP-11APP 11 - Security of personal information
AUCDR-OB-8Complaints handling
→COMPComplaints handling

Privacy Safeguards(13 mappings)

AUCDR-PS-1Privacy Safeguard 1 - Open and transparent management of CDR data
→APP-1APP 1 - Open and transparent management of personal information
AUCDR-PS-10Privacy Safeguard 10 - Notifying of the disclosure of CDR data
→APP-1APP 1 - Open and transparent management of personal information
AUCDR-PS-11Privacy Safeguard 11 - Quality of CDR data
→APP-10APP 10 - Quality of personal information
AUCDR-PS-12Privacy Safeguard 12 - Security of CDR data and destruction or de-identification of redundant CDR data
→APP-11APP 11 - Security of personal information
AUCDR-PS-13Privacy Safeguard 13 - Correction of CDR data
→APP-13APP 13 - Correction of personal information
AUCDR-PS-2Privacy Safeguard 2 - Anonymity and pseudonymity
→APP-2APP 2 - Anonymity and pseudonymity
AUCDR-PS-3Privacy Safeguard 3 - Seeking to collect CDR data from CDR participants
→APP-3APP 3 - Collection of solicited personal information
AUCDR-PS-4Privacy Safeguard 4 - Dealing with unsolicited CDR data
→APP-4APP 4 - Dealing with unsolicited personal information
AUCDR-PS-5Privacy Safeguard 5 - Notifying of the collection of CDR data
→APP-5APP 5 - Notification of the collection of personal information
AUCDR-PS-6Privacy Safeguard 6 - Use or disclosure of CDR data
→APP-6APP 6 - Use or disclosure of personal information
AUCDR-PS-7Privacy Safeguard 7 - Use or disclosure of CDR data for direct marketing
→APP-7APP 7 - Direct marketing
AUCDR-PS-8Privacy Safeguard 8 - Overseas disclosure of CDR data
→APP-8APP 8 - Cross-border disclosure of personal information
AUCDR-PS-9Privacy Safeguard 9 - Adoption or disclosure of government related identifiers
→APP-9APP 9 - Adoption, use or disclosure of government related identifiers

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) comparisons

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs APRA CPS 2347 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs GDPR7 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 56 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.06 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs Brazil Open Finance (Resolução Conjunta No. 1/2020)4 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) vs ACSC Essential Eight3 mappings

Other Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) comparisons

GDPR vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)11 mappingsAustralia My Health Records Act 2012 vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)5 mappingsPOPIA vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)4 mappingsVirginia CDPA vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)4 mappingsVietnam PDPD vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)4 mappingsVietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14) vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)4 mappingsUSMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)4 mappingsUruguay DPL vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) has 28 controls across its framework, while Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security (Schedule 2), where 6 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?

Of 28 total Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls, 18 map directly to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?

10 Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security (Schedule 2) with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (Schedule 2) (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.