GDPRvsAustralian Privacy Principles (APPs)
See exactly how GDPR controls map to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
GDPR maps to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) with 48% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 GDPR controls identifies 21 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Chapter II - Principles(17 mappings)
Chapter III - Rights of the Data Subject(3 mappings)
+23 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The GDPR to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls your existing GDPR work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
11 of 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for GDPR. 2 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Fixes the disclosure set such a policy must carry, from identity through to rights.
Grounded in GDPR-Art.13 Information to be provided where personal data are collected. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Give individuals the option of not identifying themselves, or of using a pseudonym, unless an exception applies.
Every one of the 11 evidenced controls and 2 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 48% in the header counts how many GDPR controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other GDPR comparisons
Other Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between GDPR and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?
GDPR has 40 controls across its framework, while Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (48% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor, where 13 GDPR controls have no direct Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) equivalent.
How many controls map between GDPR and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?
Of 40 total GDPR controls, 19 map directly to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls, representing 48% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping GDPR to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?
21 GDPR controls have no direct equivalent in Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between GDPR and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter IV - Controller and Processor (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.