GDPRvsAustralian Privacy Principles (APPs)
See exactly how GDPR controls map to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
GDPR maps to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) with 46% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 GDPR controls identifies 22 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 969 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 43 control mappings across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 969 frameworks.
Chapter II - Principles(17 mappings)
Chapter III - Rights of the Data Subject(3 mappings)
+23 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 969 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The GDPR to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls your existing GDPR work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
11 of 13 Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for GDPR. 2 are genuine gaps.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 46% in the header counts how many GDPR controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other GDPR comparisons
Other Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 969 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 969 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between GDPR and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?
GDPR has 41 controls across its framework, while Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor, where 13 GDPR controls have no direct Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) equivalent.
How many controls map between GDPR and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?
Of 41 total GDPR controls, 19 map directly to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) controls, representing 46% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping GDPR to Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?
22 GDPR controls have no direct equivalent in Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between GDPR and Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter IV - Controller and Processor (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.