TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia AI Ethics FrameworkvsCritical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)

See exactly how Australia AI Ethics Framework controls map to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia AI Ethics Framework maps to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) with 16% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Risk Management(9 mappings)

AU-AI-01AI risk identification and assessment3 targets
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
AU-AI-02AI system categorization by risk level2 targets
→NRF-6Vendor Risk Management
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
AU-AI-04AI model validation and testing2 targets
→NRF-6Vendor Risk Management
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
AU-AI-05Ongoing AI risk monitoring2 targets
→NRF-6Vendor Risk Management
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other Australia AI Ethics Framework comparisons

Australia AI Ethics Framework vs ISO 4200112 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs IEEE 700012 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs OECD AI Principles12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs EU AI Act12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs UK AI Regulation Framework12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs China AI Regulations12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs Singapore AI Governance Framework12 mappingsAustralia AI Ethics Framework vs Japan AI Guidelines12 mappings

Other Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)12 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australia AI Ethics Framework and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

Australia AI Ethics Framework has 25 controls across its framework, while Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight, where 5 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia AI Ethics Framework and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

Of 25 total Australia AI Ethics Framework controls, 4 map directly to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia AI Ethics Framework to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

21 Australia AI Ethics Framework controls have no direct equivalent in Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). The highest concentration of gaps is in Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia AI Ethics Framework and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Australia AI Ethics Framework: AI Accountability & Oversight (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.