TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsCritical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) with 16% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(2 mappings)

ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security

Recovering Data and System Availability(3 mappings)

ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)
→EU-CRMA-SUS-01Recycling and Circularity
ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)
→EU-CRMA-SUS-01Recycling and Circularity
ASD37-36System recovery capabilities (Very Good)
→EU-CRMA-SUS-01Recycling and Circularity

Preventing Malicious Insiders(1 mappings)

ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)20 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ISO 27001:202219 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange18 mappings

Other Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)12 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 17 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 6 map directly to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

31 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.