TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

38
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
37%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 37% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Leadership (Clause 5).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(7 mappings)

10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
9.1N32 Interface Security (PRINS/TLS)3 targets
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
9.2Network Domain Security3 targets
→3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Context of the Organisation (Clause 4)(6 mappings)

4.1External Standards3 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.2Document Control
→3.4Internal Audits
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities3 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.2Document Control
→3.4Internal Audits

Leadership (Clause 5)(3 mappings)

5.3Management of Allergens3 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.2Document Control
→3.4Internal Audits

Planning and Support (Clauses 6–7)(3 mappings)

7.1Training and Competence3 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.2Document Control
→3.4Internal Audits

Operation (Clause 8)(1 mappings)

8.5Production and Service Provision
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual

+18 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System16 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs ISO/IEC 27003:201716 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products15 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food14 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202113 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts13 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence12 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Leadership (Clause 5), where 9 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 14 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

24 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Leadership (Clause 5) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Leadership (Clause 5) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.