AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsISO 27005
See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to ISO 27005. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to ISO 27005 with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(1 mappings)
Operation (Clause 8)(9 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Other ISO 27005 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 27005?
AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while ISO 27005 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 11 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct ISO 27005 equivalent.
How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 27005?
Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 4 map directly to ISO 27005 controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to ISO 27005?
34 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27005. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 27005?
The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.