Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsISO 27005

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to ISO 27005. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to ISO 27005 with 32% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation(6 mappings)

BS65000-IM-03Continuous Improvement
ISO27005-19Continuous improvement of risk processes
ISO-8000-IMP-02Quality Improvement
ISO27005-19Continuous improvement of risk processes
PBD-IMP-02Design Methodology3 targets
ISO27005-06Risk identification methods
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis
PBD-IMP-03Organisational Integration
ISO27005-19Continuous improvement of risk processes

Resilience Model(6 mappings)

BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other ISO 27005 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ISO 27005?

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 19 controls across its framework, while ISO 27005 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation, where 12 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct ISO 27005 equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ISO 27005?

Of 19 total BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 6 map directly to ISO 27005 controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience to ISO 27005?

13 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27005. The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and ISO 27005?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.