Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsISO 27005

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to ISO 27005. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
52
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to ISO 27005 with 12% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 72 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 63 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support (Clause 7).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 72 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Improvement (Clause 10)(3 mappings)

AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
ISO27005-19Continuous improvement of risk processes
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
ISO27005-19Continuous improvement of risk processes
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
ISO27005-19Continuous improvement of risk processes

Leadership (Clause 5)(1 mappings)

AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment
8.3Statement of Applicability linkage

Operation (Clause 8)(10 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance
AS9100D-8.5Production and Service Provision
8.3Statement of Applicability linkage
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment3 targets
ISO27005-06Risk identification methods
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance

Planning (Clause 6)(6 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities6 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-06Risk identification methods
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and ISO 27005?

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 72 controls across its framework, while ISO 27005 covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support (Clause 7), where 9 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct ISO 27005 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and ISO 27005?

Of 72 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 9 map directly to ISO 27005 controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 63 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to ISO 27005?

63 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27005. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support (Clause 7) with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and ISO 27005?

The domain with the highest gap count is Support (Clause 7) (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.