Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsISO 10005:2005

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to ISO 10005:2005. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
56
Gaps Found
0%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to ISO 10005:2005 with 0% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 62 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 62 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-8.3Design and Development of Products
iso-10005-2005::5.11Design and development
AS9100D-8.5Production and Service Provision
iso-10005-2005::5.13Production and service provision

Planning(1 mappings)

AS9100D2016-6.2Quality Objectives and Planning
iso-10005-2005::5.4Quality objectives

Operation(3 mappings)

AS9100D2016-8.2Requirements for Products and Services
iso-10005-2005::5.9Requirements
AS9100D2016-8.3.4Design and Development Controls
iso-10005-2005::5.11Design and development
AS9100D2016-8.5.2Identification and Traceability
iso-10005-2005::5.14Identification and traceability

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Other ISO 10005:2005 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 10005:2005?

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 62 controls across its framework, while ISO 10005:2005 covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 10 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct ISO 10005:2005 equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 10005:2005?

Of 62 total AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 6 map directly to ISO 10005:2005 controls — representing 0% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to ISO 10005:2005?

36 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 10005:2005. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 10005:2005?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.