Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 9001:2015vsISO 10005:2005

See exactly how ISO 9001:2015 controls map to ISO 10005:2005. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
43
Gaps Found
0%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 9001:2015 maps to ISO 10005:2005 with 0% coverage across 0 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 56 ISO 9001:2015 controls identifies 56 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 56 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Planning – ISO 9001:2015(1 mappings)

iso-9001-2015::6.2Quality objectives and planning to achieve them
iso-10005-2005::5.4Quality objectives

Operation – ISO 9001:2015(12 mappings)

iso-9001-2015::8.2Requirements for products and services
iso-10005-2005::5.9Requirements
iso-9001-2015::8.2.1Customer communication
iso-10005-2005::5.10Customer communication
iso-9001-2015::8.3Design and development of products and services
iso-10005-2005::5.11Design and development
iso-9001-2015::8.3.2Design and development planning
iso-10005-2005::5.11Design and development
iso-9001-2015::8.3.3Design and development inputs
iso-10005-2005::5.11Design and development
iso-9001-2015::8.3.4Design and development controls
iso-10005-2005::5.11Design and development
iso-9001-2015::8.3.5Design and development outputs
iso-10005-2005::5.11Design and development
iso-9001-2015::8.3.6Design and development changes
iso-10005-2005::5.11Design and development
iso-9001-2015::8.5Production and service provision
iso-10005-2005::5.13Production and service provision
iso-9001-2015::8.5.1Control of production and service provision
iso-10005-2005::5.13Production and service provision
iso-9001-2015::8.5.2Identification and traceability
iso-10005-2005::5.14Identification and traceability
iso-9001-2015::8.5.4Preservation
iso-10005-2005::5.16Preservation of product

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 10005:2005?

ISO 9001:2015 has 56 controls across its framework, while ISO 10005:2005 covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 0 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 22 ISO 9001:2015 controls have no direct ISO 10005:2005 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 10005:2005?

Of 56 total ISO 9001:2015 controls, 0 map directly to ISO 10005:2005 controls — representing 0% coverage. The remaining 56 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 9001:2015 to ISO 10005:2005?

56 ISO 9001:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 10005:2005. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 10005:2005?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.