TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 31000:2018vsISO 10005:2005

See exactly how ISO 31000:2018 controls map to ISO 10005:2005. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
0%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 31000:2018 maps to ISO 10005:2005 with 0% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO 31000:2018 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Process.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Process(1 mappings)

6.5.1General risk treatment
→iso-10005-2005::5.1General

Framework – ISO 31000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-31000-2018::5.4Design
→iso-10005-2005::5.11Design and development
iso-31000-2018::5.5Implementation
→iso-10005-2005::6.2Implementation of the quality plan

Process – ISO 31000:2018(1 mappings)

iso-31000-2018::6.3Scope, context and criteria
→iso-10005-2005::5.2Scope

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 31000:2018 comparisons

ISO 31000:2018 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements3 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs ISO 134853 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs Virginia CDPA2 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs Vietnam PDPD2 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs Uruguay DPL2 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs Turkey KVKK2 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs Texas Data Privacy Act2 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs Taiwan PDPA2 mappings

Other ISO 10005:2005 comparisons

ISO 13485:2016 vs ISO 10005:200513 mappingsISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 10005:20057 mappingsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs ISO 10005:20055 mappingsISO 9001 vs ISO 10005:20054 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs ISO 10005:20053 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ISO 10005:20053 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 - Organizational Resilience Standard vs ISO 10005:20053 mappingsISO/IEC 23894:2023 vs ISO 10005:20053 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 31000:2018 and ISO 10005:2005?

ISO 31000:2018 has 32 controls across its framework, while ISO 10005:2005 covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Process, where 13 ISO 31000:2018 controls have no direct ISO 10005:2005 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 31000:2018 and ISO 10005:2005?

Of 32 total ISO 31000:2018 controls, 1 map directly to ISO 10005:2005 controls — representing 0% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 31000:2018 to ISO 10005:2005?

31 ISO 31000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 10005:2005. The highest concentration of gaps is in Process with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 31000:2018 and ISO 10005:2005?

The domain with the highest gap count is Process (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.