AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsISO 27701:2019
See exactly how AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to ISO 27701:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to ISO 27701:2019 with 33% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Leadership (Clause 5)(4 mappings)
Operation (Clause 8)(4 mappings)
Improvement(1 mappings)
Leadership(2 mappings)
Planning(1 mappings)
Support(1 mappings)
Operation(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Other ISO 27701:2019 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 27701:2019?
AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 42 controls across its framework, while ISO 27701:2019 covers 136 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 12 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct ISO 27701:2019 equivalent.
How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 27701:2019?
Of 42 total AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 14 map directly to ISO 27701:2019 controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to ISO 27701:2019?
28 AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27701:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 27701:2019?
The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.