AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9
See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 with 26% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(5 mappings)
Context of the Organisation (Clause 4)(10 mappings)
Leadership (Clause 5)(5 mappings)
+23 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9?
AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 10 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 equivalent.
How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9?
Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 10 map directly to BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9?
28 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9?
The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.