Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9

See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

32
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 with 18% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Leadership (Clause 5)(6 mappings)

5.3Management of Allergens6 targets
3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
3.2Document Control
3.4Internal Audits
4.1External Standards
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities
7.1Training and Competence

Operation (Clause 8)(14 mappings)

8.5Production and Service Provision7 targets
3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
3.2Document Control
3.4Internal Audits
4.1External Standards
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities
5.3Management of Allergens
7.1Training and Competence
8.5.2Identification and Traceability7 targets
3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
3.2Document Control
3.4Internal Audits
4.1External Standards
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities
5.3Management of Allergens
7.1Training and Competence

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons

Other BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9?

ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 57 controls across its framework, while BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 10 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9?

Of 57 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 10 map directly to BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9?

47 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.