Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsUS Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements with 14% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 725 frameworks | 447K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 447K+ mappings across 725 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(1 mappings)

CPS234-07Endpoint protection and detection
CYB-3Device Security Measures

APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience(1 mappings)

CPS234-12Disaster recovery procedures
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Controls(2 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls2 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting(6 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls2 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing2 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan
CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security2 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Assurance(2 mappings)

CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing2 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Audit(2 mappings)

CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security2 targets
CSO-3Cybersecurity Drills and Exercises
CYB-5Cyber Incident Response Plan

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons

Other US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 725 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 725 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (447K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 8 map directly to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

37 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and US Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) and USCG Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.