Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
42
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework with 9% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 51 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Business Continuity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(1 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
SYSC 15A.3.3Consumer and Market Impact Assessment

Critical Operations(1 mappings)

CPS230-22Vulnerability and Gap Identification
SYSC 15A.4.4Remediation Planning

Operations(1 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management
SYSC 15A.6.4Outsourcing and Third-Party Risk

Business Continuity(1 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management
SYSC 15A.6.4Outsourcing and Third-Party Risk

Service Provider Management(1 mappings)

CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers
SYSC 15A.6.4Outsourcing and Third-Party Risk

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

Other UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 716 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 47 controls across its framework, while UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Business Continuity, where 11 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

Of 47 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 5 map directly to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 51 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

51 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Business Continuity with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Business Continuity (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.