APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsUK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework
See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework with 18% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 87 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 71 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 87 controls analysed | 969 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 control mappings across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 969 frameworks.
Superseded batch representation – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management(3 mappings)
Key principles and operational risk management framework (paras 11 to 18) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management(2 mappings)
Roles and responsibilities (paras 19 to 22) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management(1 mappings)
Operational risk management, controls and incidents (paras 23 to 32) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management(2 mappings)
Business continuity (paras 33 to 45) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management(5 mappings)
Management of service provider arrangements (paras 46 to 61) – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management(3 mappings)
A APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls your existing APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 18% in the header counts how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons
Other UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 969 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 969 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?
APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 87 controls across its framework, while UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management, where 40 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework equivalent.
How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?
Of 87 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 16 map directly to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework controls, representing 18% coverage. The remaining 71 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?
71 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management with 40 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework?
The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management (40 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.