TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)vsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)

See exactly how AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls map to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) maps to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AML/CTF Program Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Customer Identification (KYC)(1 mappings)

AMLCTF-35Identity Verification Standard
→SSAE18-CC6.2CC6.2 - New User Registration and Authorization

AML/CTF Program Requirements(4 mappings)

AMLCTF-82Part A Compliance
→SSAE18-CC9.2CC9.2 - Vendor and Business Partner Risk Management
AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssessML/TF Risk Assessment3 targets
→SSAE18-CC3.1CC3.1 - COSO Principle 6: Risk Identification
→SSAE18-CC3.2CC3.2 - COSO Principle 7: Risk Analysis
→SSAE18-SOC1-02Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)27 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security3 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST Privacy Framework3 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs MTCS (Singapore)3 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs FedRAMP Rev 53 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements3 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 53 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.03 mappings

Other SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) comparisons

Azure Security Benchmark vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)14 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)13 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)13 mappingsSOC 2 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)13 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)12 mappingsISO 27018 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)12 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)12 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) has 39 controls across its framework, while SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) covers 67 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AML/CTF Program Requirements, where 9 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) equivalent.

How many controls map between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?

Of 39 total AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls, 3 map directly to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?

36 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting). The highest concentration of gaps is in AML/CTF Program Requirements with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AML/CTF Program Requirements (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.