AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)vsBank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)
See exactly how AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls map to Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) maps to Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) with 69% coverage across 27 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Registration.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Record-Keeping Obligations(5 mappings)
Customer Identification (KYC)(7 mappings)
Reporting Obligations (AML/CTF)(6 mappings)
AML/CTF Program Requirements(2 mappings)
+10 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) to Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls your existing AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 69% in the header counts how many AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons
Other Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)?
AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) has 39 controls across its framework, while Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 27 overlapping controls (69% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Registration, where 2 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) equivalent.
How many controls map between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)?
Of 39 total AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls, 27 map directly to Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) controls, representing 69% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) to Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)?
12 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML). The highest concentration of gaps is in Registration with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Registration (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.