NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)
See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) with 31% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
System Protection and Communications(8 mappings)
Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(5 mappings)
Incident Response and Media Protection(7 mappings)
+4 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons
Other SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?
NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) covers 67 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 12 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?
Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 11 map directly to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?
24 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting). The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?
The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.