TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

35
Controls Mapped
71
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) with 17% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 88 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

DE - Detect(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria2 targets
→SSAE18-CC7.4CC7.4 - Incident Response
→SSAE18-PI1.1PI1.1 - Processing Integrity Definition

GV - Govern(6 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→SSAE18-CC9.2CC9.2 - Vendor and Business Partner Risk Management
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→SSAE18-CC9.2CC9.2 - Vendor and Business Partner Risk Management
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments3 targets
→SSAE18-CC3.1CC3.1 - COSO Principle 6: Risk Identification
→SSAE18-CC3.2CC3.2 - COSO Principle 7: Risk Analysis
→SSAE18-SOC1-02Risk Assessment
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→SSAE18-CC9.2CC9.2 - Vendor and Business Partner Risk Management

ID - Identify(5 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans are established and maintained2 targets
→SSAE18-CC7.4CC7.4 - Incident Response
→SSAE18-CC7.5CC7.5 - Incident Recovery
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified3 targets
→SSAE18-CC3.1CC3.1 - COSO Principle 6: Risk Identification
→SSAE18-CC3.2CC3.2 - COSO Principle 7: Risk Analysis
→SSAE18-SOC1-02Risk Assessment

PR - Protect(7 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→SSAE18-CC6.2CC6.2 - New User Registration and Authorization
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
→SSAE18-CC6.2CC6.2 - New User Registration and Authorization
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed4 targets
→SSAE18-CC6.2CC6.2 - New User Registration and Authorization
→SSAE18-CC7.4CC7.4 - Incident Response
→SSAE18-PI1.1PI1.1 - Processing Integrity Definition
→SSAE18-SOC1-06Transaction Processing Controls
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
→SSAE18-CC6.4CC6.4 - Physical Access Restrictions

+15 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 706 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) comparisons

Azure Security Benchmark vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)14 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)13 mappingsSOC 2 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)13 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)12 mappingsISO 27018 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)12 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)12 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)12 mappingsISO 27017 vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) covers 67 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 18 map directly to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 88 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?

88 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.