TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AML/CTF Program Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Customer Identification (KYC)(2 mappings)

AMLCTF-35Identity Verification Standard2 targets
→3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
→3.7.1Key generation procedures

AML/CTF Program Requirements(3 mappings)

AMLCTF-82Part A Compliance2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssessML/TF Risk Assessment
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

Related Comparisons

Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML)27 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security3 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST Privacy Framework3 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs MTCS (Singapore)3 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs FedRAMP Rev 53 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 53 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.03 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)3 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsISO 13485 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) has 39 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AML/CTF Program Requirements, where 9 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 39 total AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

36 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in AML/CTF Program Requirements with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is AML/CTF Program Requirements (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.