AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)vsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual
See exactly how AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls map to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) maps to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual with 2% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 64 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls identifies 63 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Reporting Obligations.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 64 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.
Customer Identification (KYC)(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons
Other IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 769 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?
AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) has 64 controls across its framework, while IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Reporting Obligations, where 17 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual equivalent.
How many controls map between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?
Of 64 total AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls, 1 map directly to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 63 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?
63 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. The highest concentration of gaps is in Reporting Obligations with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?
The domain with the highest gap count is Reporting Obligations (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.