TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsCCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
45%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) with 45% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Architecture Overview.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(5 mappings)

6.12Subscription Identifier Privacy4 targets
→SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
→SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
→SEC-3.4Key Management
A.2Risk Assessment
→SEC-1.2Risk Assessment Methodology

Authentication and Key Management(8 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy
→SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition
6.4Secondary Authentication3 targets
→SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication
→SEC-2.3Data Origin Authentication
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
6.5AUSF and SEAF Functions4 targets
→SEC-2.1Telecommand Authentication
→SEC-2.3Data Origin Authentication
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
→SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition

Radio and Access Network Security(7 mappings)

6.6RRC and UP Ciphering and Integrity3 targets
→SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
→SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
→SEC-3.3Authenticated Encryption
6.7Security Key Establishment for Radio Bearers4 targets
→SEC-3.1Space Data Link Encryption
→SEC-3.2Cryptographic Algorithm Standards
→SEC-3.4Key Management
→SEC-5.1Security Policy Definition

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings

Other CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)11 mappingsISO 27017 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Architecture Overview, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 10 map directly to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems) controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

12 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Architecture Overview with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and CCSDS 350.0-G-3 — Space Communications Security (Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Architecture Overview (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.