TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation

See exactly how 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

33
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
59%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 59% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Architecture Overview.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 33 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Subscriber Privacy and Service Security(17 mappings)

6.12Subscription Identifier Privacy
→OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
A.1Governance Framework2 targets
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
A.2Risk Assessment6 targets
→CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
→JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
→KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
→RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
A.3Asset Management2 targets
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
A.4Supply Chain Risk Management6 targets
→FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
→JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
→JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
→KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework

Authentication and Key Management(3 mappings)

6.3SUPI and SUCI Privacy2 targets
→FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
6.4Secondary Authentication
→OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management

+13 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) comparisons

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts15 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202115 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs South Korea ISMS-P13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments13 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management13 mappings

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) has 22 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (59% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Architecture Overview, where 4 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

Of 22 total 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls, 13 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 59% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

9 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Architecture Overview with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Architecture Overview (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.