Erase personal data without undue delay where the data is no longer necessary for the purposes it was collected or processed for, where consent is withdrawn and no other legal ground applies, where the data subject objects under Article 21(1) and there are no overriding legitimate grounds or objects to direct marketing under Article 21(2), where the data has been unlawfully processed, where erasure is required by Union or Member State law, or where the data was collected in relation to information society services offered to a child. Where the data has been made public, take reasonable steps including technical measures, allowing for available technology and the cost of implementation, to inform other controllers processing it that erasure of any links to, or copies or replications of, the data has been requested. The obligation does not apply to the extent processing is necessary for freedom of expression and information, for compliance with a legal obligation or a public interest task, for public health reasons, for archiving, research or statistics under Article 89(1) where erasure would seriously impair those objectives, or for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims.
GDPR GDPR-Art.17 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of GDPR your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27701:2019 and 21 of 40 GDPR controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO 27701:2019 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.