The entity must write and keep a site-specific Laboratory Management Plan (one plan may cover laboratories at sites with different EPA IDs) with two parts and nine elements. Part I, which is enforceable, must describe container labelling (the term used in place of "unwanted material" and how associated information is imparted) and state which removal option of 262.208(a) applies. Part II must describe the entity's intended best practices for container labelling and management, training of laboratory workers and students, training for safe on-site transfers by trained professionals, removal (the regular schedule, removals when maximum volumes are exceeded and how that is communicated), making hazardous waste determinations with the duties of those involved, laboratory clean-outs and their documentation if used, and emergency prevention (procedures for prevention, notification and response; a list of chemicals that become more dangerous past expiry or as they degrade and procedures to dispose of them safely; and timely characterisation of unknowns). The plan must be available to laboratory workers, students and others who ask, and reviewed and revised as needed.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.