Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-PA-4: Review and reconcile user access regularly

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 55 controls across 27 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 4 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-2(7) Privileged User Accounts
AC-6(7) Review of User Privileges
PS-5 Personnel Transfer

FedRAMP Moderate · 4 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-2(7) Privileged User Accounts
AC-6(7) Review of User Privileges
PS-5 Personnel Transfer

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 3 controls

ANSSI-HYG-05 Maintain an Exhaustive Inventory of Privileged Accounts
ANSSI-HYG-06 Organise Joiner, Leaver and Role Change Procedures
ANSSI-HYG-09 Assign the Correct Rights on Sensitive Resources

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 3 controls

SEC02-BP05 Audit and rotate credentials periodically
SEC03-BP04 Reduce permissions continuously
SEC03-BP07 Analyze public and cross-account access

CIS Controls v8 · 3 controls

CIS-5.1 Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Accounts
CIS-5.3 Disable Dormant Accounts
CIS-6.2 Establish an Access Revoking Process

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE · 3 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-6(7) Review of User Privileges
PS-5 Personnel Transfer

NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH · 3 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-6(7) Review of User Privileges
PS-5 Personnel Transfer

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

7.2.5.1 App and system account review cadence
8.2.6 Inactive user accounts are removed or disabled within 90 days of inactivity
7.2.4 All user accounts and related access privileges, including third-party/vendor accounts, are reviewed as follows: • At least once every six months. • To ensure user accounts and access remain appropriate based on job function.

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-IDM-04 Withdraw or adjust access rights as the task area changes
C5-IDM-05 Regular review of access rights

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

AC.L2-3.1.5 Least Privilege
IA.L2-3.5.6 Identifier Handling

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)
164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

5.18 Access rights
8.2 Privileged access rights

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.18 Access rights
8.2 Privileged access rights

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.01.01 Account Management
03.01.05 Least Privilege

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW · 2 controls

AC-2 Account Management
PS-5 Personnel Transfer

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)
164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

SOC 2 · 2 controls

SOC2-CC6.2 Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
SOC2-CC6.3 Role-based access and least privilege are enforced

UK Cyber Essentials · 2 controls

CE-AC.3 Remove or Disable Accounts When No Longer Required
CE-AC.6 Periodic Review of Privileged Access

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-ADMIN-ML2 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML2)

APPI · 1 control

APPI-A24 Supervision of Employees

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-3 Information Security Category

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IAM-08 User Access Review

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 1 control

161R1-AC-2 Account Management

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-AC-2 Account management

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Azure Security Benchmark have you already done?

Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-PA-4 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 71 of 85 Azure Security Benchmark controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 583.5% covered · 14 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate78.8% covered · 18 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.172.9% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202269.4% covered · 26 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)65.9% covered · 29 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202261.2% covered · 33 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free