A user account must be disabled or removed once it has gone unused for 90 days. The guidance explains that unused accounts are attractive targets because changes to them, such as a new password, tend to go unnoticed, and advises that where an extended absence such as a leave of absence is expected, the account be disabled when the absence begins rather than after 90 days. Objective under the customized approach: inactive user accounts cannot be used.
This control maps to 27 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
PCI DSS 4.0 8.2.6 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 27 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.