Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-PA-6: Use privileged access workstations

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 57 controls across 24 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 5 controls

AC-17 Remote Access
AC-17(4) Privileged Commands and Access
AC-6(2) Non-Privileged Access for Nonsecurity Functions
MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance
SC-2 Separation of System and User Functionality

FedRAMP Moderate · 5 controls

AC-17 Remote Access
AC-17(4) Privileged Commands and Access
AC-6(2) Non-Privileged Access for Nonsecurity Functions
MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance
SC-2 Separation of System and User Functionality

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE · 5 controls

AC-17 Remote Access
AC-17(4) Privileged Commands and Access
AC-6(2) Non-Privileged Access for Nonsecurity Functions
MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance
SC-2 Separation of System and User Functionality

NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH · 5 controls

AC-17 Remote Access
AC-17(4) Privileged Commands and Access
AC-6(2) Non-Privileged Access for Nonsecurity Functions
MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance
SC-2 Separation of System and User Functionality

CMMC 2.0 · 4 controls

AC.L2-3.1.12 Control Remote Access
AC.L2-3.1.15 Privileged Remote Access
MA.L2-3.7.5 Nonlocal Maintenance
SC.L2-3.13.3 Role Separation

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

NIST800-AC-17 Remote access
NIST800-AC-19 Access control for mobile devices
NIST800-MA-4 Nonlocal maintenance
NIST800-SC-2 Separation of system and user functionality

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 3 controls

ANSSI-HYG-08 Identify Each Person by Name and Separate User and Administrator Roles
ANSSI-HYG-27 Prohibit Internet Access from Administration Workstations and Servers
ANSSI-HYG-28 Use a Dedicated and Partitioned Network for Administration

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

6.7 Remote working
8.1 User end point devices
8.18 Use of privileged utility programs

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

6.7 Remote working
8.1 User endpoint devices
8.2 Privileged access rights

ACSC Essential Eight · 2 controls

E8-ADMIN-ML1 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML1)
E8-ADMIN-ML3 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML3)

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-12.8 Establish and Maintain Dedicated Computing Resources for All Administrative Work
CIS-4.6 Securely Manage Enterprise Assets and Software

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-HRS-04 Remote and Home Working Policy and Procedures
CCM-UEM-05 Endpoint Management

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.01.12 Remote Access
03.07.05 Nonlocal Maintenance

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW · 2 controls

AC-17 Remote Access
MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC06-BP03 Reduce manual management and interactive access

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-COS-05 Networks for administration

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.310(c) Workstation Security (Standard)

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01 Configuration management practices are established and applied

NIST SP 800-172 · 1 control

3.1.2e Restrict Access to Organization-Owned, Provisioned, or Issued Information Resources

NIST SP 800-218 · 1 control

SP800-218-PO.5.2 Harden Development Endpoints

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.310(c) Workstation Security (Standard)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

2.2.7 Non-console administrative access encrypted

UK Cyber Essentials · 1 control

CE-AC.5 Separate Admin Accounts for Administrative Activities

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Azure Security Benchmark have you already done?

Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-PA-6 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 71 of 85 Azure Security Benchmark controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 583.5% covered · 14 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate78.8% covered · 18 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.172.9% covered · 23 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202269.4% covered · 26 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)65.9% covered · 29 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202261.2% covered · 33 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free