C5 (Germany) C5-IDM-05: Regular review of access rights

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 39 controls across 23 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 3 controls

ANSSI-HYG-05 Maintain an Exhaustive Inventory of Privileged Accounts
ANSSI-HYG-09 Assign the Correct Rights on Sensitive Resources
ANSSI-HYG-29 Limit Administration Rights on Workstations to Operational Need

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 3 controls

SEC02-BP05 Audit and rotate credentials periodically
SEC03-BP04 Reduce permissions continuously
SEC03-BP07 Analyze public and cross-account access

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-6 Least Privilege
AC-6(7) Review of User Privileges

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-6 Least Privilege
AC-6(7) Review of User Privileges

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-PA-4 Review and reconcile user access regularly
PA-2 Avoid standing access for user accounts and permissions

HIPAA Security Rule · 2 controls

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)
164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-AC-2 Account Management
161R1-AC-6 Least Privilege

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.01.01 Account Management
03.01.05 Least Privilege

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-AC-2 AC-2 Account Management
NIST800-AC-6 AC-6 Least Privilege

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 2 controls

164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D) Information System Activity Review (Required)
164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

7.2.5.1 7.2.5.1 Application and system account access reviewed periodically
7.2.4 7.2.4 User accounts and privileges reviewed every six months

UK Cyber Essentials · 2 controls

CE-AC.4 Privileged Account Approval and Tracking
CE-AC.6 Periodic Review of Privileged Access

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-ADMIN-ML2 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML2)

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CIS-5.1 Establish and Maintain an Inventory of Accounts

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

AC.L2-3.1.5 Least Privilege

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IAM-08 User Access Review

DORA · 1 control

DORA-Art.9 Protection and prevention

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

Art.21.2.i Human resources security, access control policies and asset management

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of C5 (Germany) have you already done?

C5 (Germany) C5-IDM-05 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of C5 (Germany) your existing evidence covers. Hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and 95 of 121 C5 (Germany) controls already carry evidence.

If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.178.5% covered · 26 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 572.7% covered · 33 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate71.1% covered · 35 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202267.8% covered · 39 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202257% covered · 52 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 350.4% covered · 60 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free