Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 CCM-IAM-08: User Access Review

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 34 controls across 22 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 3 controls

SEC02-BP05 Audit and rotate credentials periodically
SEC03-BP04 Reduce permissions continuously
SEC03-BP07 Analyze public and cross-account access

FedRAMP High · 3 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-2(3) Disable Accounts
AC-6(7) Review of User Privileges

FedRAMP Moderate · 3 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-2(3) Disable Accounts
AC-6(7) Review of User Privileges

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

7.2.5.1 7.2.5.1 Application and system account access reviewed periodically
8.2.6 8.2.6 Inactive accounts removed within 90 days
7.2.4 7.2.4 User accounts and privileges reviewed every six months

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-PA-4 Review and reconcile user access regularly
PA-3 Manage lifecycle of identities and entitlements

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-IDM-03 Locking and withdrawal of user accounts in the event of inactivity or multiple failed logins
C5-IDM-05 Regular review of access rights

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-5.3 Disable Dormant Accounts
CIS-6.8 Define and Maintain Role-Based Access Control

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

AC.L2-3.1.5 Least Privilege
IA.L2-3.5.6 Identifier Handling

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-ADMIN-ML2 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML2)

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-09 Assign the Correct Rights on Sensitive Resources

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 · 1 control

MYHR-SEC-3 Audit logging and access monitoring

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.01.05 Least Privilege

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-AC-2 AC-2 Account Management

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

SOC 2 · 1 control

SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties

UK Cyber Essentials · 1 control

CE-AC.6 Periodic Review of Privileged Access

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 have you already done?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 CCM-IAM-08 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 140 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 571.1% covered · 57 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate60.4% covered · 78 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.060.4% covered · 78 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)58.4% covered · 82 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202256.3% covered · 86 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 86 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 12 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free