Azure Security Benchmark
Privileged Access

Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-PA-8: Determine access process for cloud provider support

Establish an approval process and secure access path for cloud provider support requests that involve temporary access to organisational data.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 49 controls across 21 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

FedRAMP High · 6 controls

  • AC-20 Use of External Systems
  • IR-7 Incident Response Assistance
  • MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance
  • MA-5 Maintenance Personnel
  • PS-7 External Personnel Security
  • SA-9 External System Services

FedRAMP Moderate · 6 controls

  • AC-20 Use of External Systems
  • IR-7 Incident Response Assistance
  • MA-4 Nonlocal Maintenance
  • MA-5 Maintenance Personnel
  • PS-7 External Personnel Security
  • SA-9 External System Services

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 6 controls

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 5 controls

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 4 controls

CMMC 2.0 · 3 controls

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

  • C5-IDM-07 Access to cloud customer data
  • C5-SSO-01 Policies and instructions for controlling and monitoring third parties

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.19 Information security in supplier relationships
  • 5.23 Information security for use of cloud services

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.19 Information security in supplier relationships
  • 5.23 Information security for use of cloud services

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

  • 12.8.4 12.8.4 Annual monitoring of TPSP compliance status
  • 8.2.7 8.2.7 Third-party remote access accounts controlled
  • ANSSI-HYG-03 Control the Risks of Outsourced Information System Management
  • CPS230-46 Ongoing Risk Management of Each Material Arrangement

APRA CPS 234 · 1 control

  • CPS234-P22 Evaluation of Third Party Control Design
  • SEC03-BP09 Share resources securely with a third party

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

  • CCM-IAM-11 CSCs Approval for Agreed Privileged Access Roles

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

  • 164.308(b)(1) Business Associate Contracts and Other Arrangements (Standard)

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

  • 6.12.1 Information security in supplier relationships
  • NIST-CSF-DE.CM-06 External service provider activities and services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
  • 164.308(b)(1) Business Associate Contracts and Other Arrangements (Standard)

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC9.2 CC9.2 Assessing and managing vendor and business partner risk

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in Privileged Access

You are reading one control. How much of Azure Security Benchmark have you already done?

Azure Security Benchmark ASBv3-PA-8 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 71 of 85 Azure Security Benchmark controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 49 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.