FedRAMP Moderate PS-5: Personnel Transfer

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 28 controls across 18 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC6.1 Implements logical access security software, infrastructure and architectures over protected information assets
SOC2-CC6.2 Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
SOC2-CC6.3 Role-based access and least privilege are enforced

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

ASBv3-PA-4 Review and reconcile user access regularly
PA-3 Manage lifecycle of identities and entitlements

C5 (Germany) · 2 controls

C5-HR-05 Responsibilities in the event of termination or change of employment
C5-IDM-04 Withdraw or adjust access rights as the task area changes

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-HRS-06 Employment Termination
CCM-IAM-07 User Access Changes and Revocation

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

5.18 Access rights
6.5 Responsibilities after termination or change of employment

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.18 Access rights
6.5 Responsibilities after termination or change of employment

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-GV.RR-04 Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-PS-5 Personnel transfer
SP800-53-PS Personnel Security Family

PCI DSS 4.0 · 2 controls

8.2.5 Access for terminated users is immediately revoked
7.2.4 All user accounts and related access privileges, including third-party/vendor accounts, are reviewed as follows: • At least once every six months. • To ensure user accounts and access remain appropriate based on job function.

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-06 Organise Joiner, Leaver and Role Change Procedures

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC03-BP06 Manage access based on lifecycle

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 · 1 control

MYHR-SEC-2 Access controls and user account management

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

CIS-6.2 Establish an Access Revoking Process

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

PS.L2-3.9.2 Personnel Actions

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

6.4.3 Termination and change of employment

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.09.02 Personnel Termination and Transfer

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate PS-5 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free