All access held by application and system accounts, together with their related privileges, must be reviewed periodically, at a frequency set by the entity's own targeted risk analysis carried out as Requirement 12.3.1 specifies. Each review must confirm that the account's access is still appropriate for the function it performs, address any inappropriate access, and record management's acknowledgement that the access remains appropriate. Objective under the customized approach: management periodically verifies that privilege assignments for application and system accounts are correct and remediates nonconformities. Future-dated: treated as a best practice up to 31 March 2025 and mandatory since then.
This control maps to 18 controls across 15 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
PCI DSS 4.0 7.2.5.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 18 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.