FedRAMP High AC-6(7): Review of User Privileges

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 29 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 4 controls

SOC2-CC4.1 COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations
SOC2-CC5.1 COSO principle 10: Selects and develops control activities to mitigate risks
SOC2-CC6.2 Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established
SOC2-CC6.3 Role-based access and least privilege are enforced

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

5.18 Access rights
5.35 Independent review of information security
8.2 Privileged access rights

PCI DSS 4.0 · 3 controls

7.2.2 Access is assigned to users, including privileged users, based on: • Job classification and function. • Least privileges necessary to perform job responsibilities
7.2.5.1 App and system account review cadence
7.2.4 All user accounts and related access privileges, including third-party/vendor accounts, are reviewed as follows: • At least once every six months. • To ensure user accounts and access remain appropriate based on job function.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 2 controls

SEC02-BP05 Audit and rotate credentials periodically
SEC03-BP04 Reduce permissions continuously

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-5.3 Disable Dormant Accounts
CIS-6.8 Define and Maintain Role-Based Access Control

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-ADMIN-ML2 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML2)

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 1 control

ANSSI-HYG-09 Assign the Correct Rights on Sensitive Resources

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

ASBv3-PA-4 Review and reconcile user access regularly

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-IDM-05 Regular review of access rights

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

AC.L2-3.1.5 Least Privilege

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-IAM-08 User Access Review

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

NIS2 Directive · 1 control

Art.21.2.i Human resources security, access control policies and asset management

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.01.05 Least Privilege

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-AC-2 Account management

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C) Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

UK Cyber Essentials · 1 control

CE-AC.6 Periodic Review of Privileged Access

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High AC-6(7) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

If you hold C5 (Germany)29% covered · 291 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free