TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility CybersecurityvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

53
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
64%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 64% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 53 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Controls(20 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue5 targets
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→3.6Incident Response
→3.6.1Incident Response Plan Assessment
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management3 targets
→3.11Risk Assessment
→3.6Incident Response
→3.6.1Incident Response Plan Assessment
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection5 targets
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→3.3.1Audit Event Assessment
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification2 targets
→3.7Identification and Authentication
→3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs3 targets
→3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy

+33 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity comparisons

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation17 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs FedRAMP Rev 517 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs South Korea ISMS-P17 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.016 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management16 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)16 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity has 25 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 7 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 25 total NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls, 16 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

9 NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.