Cross-Framework Mapping

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience RequirementsvsC-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism

See exactly how UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls map to C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
34%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements maps to C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism with 34% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Physical Controls)(1 mappings)

RTS 4.11Equipment protection
CTPAT-PS-1Physical Facility Security

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls)(9 mappings)

RTS 4.15Privileged access management6 targets
AEO-PS-3Access Management
CTPAT-CY-2Cybersecurity Policies
CTPAT-PS-2Access Control Systems
ISM-1503Separate Privileged Operating Environments
ISM-1507Privileged Access Limitation
ISM-1508Privileged Access Review
RTS 4.18Backup and recovery
PSPF-PERS-4Separation and Transfer
RTS 4.19Logging and monitoring
CTPAT-PS-3Monitoring and Surveillance
RTS 4.22Network security
CTPAT-PS-3Monitoring and Surveillance

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Organisational Controls)(8 mappings)

RTS 4.3Access management and identity controls3 targets
AEO-PS-3Access Management
CTPAT-CY-2Cybersecurity Policies
CTPAT-PS-2Access Control Systems
RTS 4.4Supplier relationship security3 targets
AEO-PS-2Security Awareness Training
CTPAT-PE-1Pre-Employment Verification
CTPAT-PE-3Education and Training
RTS 4.5Incident management2 targets
CTPAT-CY-2Cybersecurity Policies
CTPAT-PR-3Incident Reporting

RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (People Controls)(2 mappings)

RTS 4.7Security awareness training2 targets
AEO-PS-2Security Awareness Training
CTPAT-PE-3Education and Training

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements comparisons

Other C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism?

UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements has 29 controls across its framework, while C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls), where 5 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism equivalent.

How many controls map between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism?

Of 29 total UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls, 10 map directly to C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements to C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism?

19 UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism. The highest concentration of gaps is in RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Gambling Commission — Cyber Resilience Requirements and C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism?

The domain with the highest gap count is RTS Section 4 — Security Requirements (Technological Controls) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.