Cross-Framework Mapping

SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

35
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 19% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 67 SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls identifies 54 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SOC 2 - Security (Common Criteria).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 67 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

SOC 2 - Additional Trust Services Categories(11 mappings)

SSAE18-A1.1A1.1 - Availability Commitments and Requirements3 targets
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
SSAE18-A1.2A1.2 - Environmental Protections and Recovery3 targets
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
SSAE18-A1.3A1.3 - Recovery Plan Testing3 targets
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
SSAE18-PI1.1PI1.1 - Processing Integrity Definition2 targets
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

SOC 2 - Security (Common Criteria)(4 mappings)

SSAE18-CC3.1CC3.1 - COSO Principle 6: Risk Identification2 targets
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
SSAE18-CC3.2CC3.2 - COSO Principle 7: Risk Analysis2 targets
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified

SOC 2 - Logical and Physical Access Controls(4 mappings)

SSAE18-CC6.2CC6.2 - New User Registration and Authorization3 targets
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
SSAE18-CC6.4CC6.4 - Physical Access Restrictions
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced

SOC 2 - System Operations and Change Management(1 mappings)

SSAE18-CC7.4CC7.4 - Incident Response
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria

+15 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) has 67 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SOC 2 - Security (Common Criteria), where 10 SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 67 total SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls, 13 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 54 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

54 SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in SOC 2 - Security (Common Criteria) with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is SOC 2 - Security (Common Criteria) (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.