TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality FoodvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 9% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food controls identifies 41 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Module 2: SQF System Elements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

2.1 Management Commitment(3 mappings)

2.1.3Food Safety and Quality Culture3 targets
→3.1Physical Security
→3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
→3.4Enforce Data Retention

2.4 Food Safety System(1 mappings)

2.4.4Hazard Analysis and Risk Assessment
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

2.5 SQF System Verification(1 mappings)

2.5.2Verification Activities
→3.1Physical Security

2.7 Food Defence and Food Fraud(4 mappings)

2.7.2Food Fraud Plan4 targets
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data
Coverage crosswalk

A SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls your existing SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food into NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements into SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 9% in the header counts how many SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food comparisons

SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food vs ISO 270055 mappingsSQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food vs ISO/IEC 27003:20175 mappingsSQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products4 mappingsSQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food vs IATF 16949:2016 - Quality Management System for Automotive Production4 mappingsSQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food vs GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v64 mappingsSQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System4 mappingsSQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food vs ISO 134854 mappingsSQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food vs UK FCA/PRA Operational Resilience Framework3 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food has 45 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Module 2: SQF System Elements, where 17 SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 45 total SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, representing 9% coverage. The remaining 41 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

41 SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Module 2: SQF System Elements with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Module 2: SQF System Elements (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.