SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality FoodvsIATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production
See exactly how SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls map to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food maps to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production with 17% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Management Commitment.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Document Control and Training(2 mappings)
Food Safety Plan and HACCP(2 mappings)
SQF System Verification(5 mappings)
Product Traceability and Crisis Management(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food comparisons
Other IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food has 30 controls across its framework, while IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Management Commitment, where 8 SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls have no direct IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production equivalent.
How many controls map between SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
Of 30 total SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls, 5 map directly to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food to IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
25 SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls have no direct equivalent in IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production. The highest concentration of gaps is in Management Commitment with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food and IATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production?
The domain with the highest gap count is Management Commitment (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.