SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality FoodvsISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories
See exactly how SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 20% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Management Commitment(9 mappings)
Document Control and Training(3 mappings)
SQF System Verification(3 mappings)
Product Traceability and Crisis Management(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food has 30 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 65 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), where 5 SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.
How many controls map between SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
Of 30 total SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
24 SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
The domain with the highest gap count is Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.