TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsISO 31000

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to ISO 31000. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to ISO 31000 with 15% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Personal Information Processing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Management System Requirements(7 mappings)

ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management6 targets
→ISO31000-01Risk management policy and scope
→ISO31000-05Risk management integration
→ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation
→ISO31000-09Risk scenario development
→ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis
→ISO31000-18Risk register maintenance
ISMSP-MS-04Management Review and Improvement
→ISO31000-19Continuous improvement of risk processes

Protection Measures — System and Data Security(3 mappings)

ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management3 targets
→ISO31000-07Risk analysis and evaluation
→ISO31000-09Risk scenario development
→ISO31000-10Risk interdependency analysis

Related Comparisons

Other South Korea ISMS-P comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs FedRAMP Rev 515 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CSA CCM v415 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange15 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation14 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework14 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST Privacy Framework 1.014 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)13 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 513 mappings

Other ISO 31000 comparisons

EASA Part-IS — Information Security in Aviation vs ISO 310007 mappingsCOSO ERM vs ISO 310007 mappingsISO 27005 vs ISO 310007 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 310007 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO 310007 mappingsAS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs ISO 310007 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs ISO 310007 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) vs ISO 310007 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO 31000?

South Korea ISMS-P has 20 controls across its framework, while ISO 31000 covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Personal Information Processing, where 6 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct ISO 31000 equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO 31000?

Of 20 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 3 map directly to ISO 31000 controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to ISO 31000?

17 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 31000. The highest concentration of gaps is in Personal Information Processing with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and ISO 31000?

The domain with the highest gap count is Personal Information Processing (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.