Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsCSA CCM v4

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

58
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to CSA CCM v4 with 75% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Management System Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 58 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Protection Measures — Access Control and Authentication(15 mappings)

ISMSP-AC-01Access Control Policy4 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-05Least privilege
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
ISMSP-AC-02User Account Management3 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
ISMSP-AC-03Authentication Mechanisms3 targets
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication
CSA-IAM-15Passwords management
ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control5 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
CSA-IVS-03Network security
CSA-UEM-10Software firewall

Management System Requirements(4 mappings)

ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management4 targets
CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis
CSA-CEK-06Encryption risk management
CSA-DSP-09Data protection impact assessment
CSA-GRC-02Risk management program

Personal Information Processing(1 mappings)

ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
CSA-DSP-01Security and privacy policy and procedures

+38 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and CSA CCM v4?

South Korea ISMS-P has 20 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Management System Requirements, where 3 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and CSA CCM v4?

Of 20 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 15 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to CSA CCM v4?

5 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in Management System Requirements with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and CSA CCM v4?

The domain with the highest gap count is Management System Requirements (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.