TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token RegulationvsDirective (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law

See exactly how Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls map to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation maps to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law with 4% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 1 — Preliminary.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Part 5 — DPT-Specific Consumer Protections(2 mappings)

Sec. 54Risk disclosure requirements2 targets
→WPD-PUB-01Conditions for Protected Public Disclosure
→WPD-PUB-02Media Protection

Related Comparisons

Other Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation comparisons

Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs MiFID II / MiFIR14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs Uzbekistan Law on Personal Data (No. ZRU-547)14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs North Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020)14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs Malta Data Protection Act (Cap. 586, 2018)14 mappings

Other Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law comparisons

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules vs Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law2 mappingsEU Digital Services Act vs Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law2 mappingsUAE Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) Regulations vs Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law2 mappingsUK Online Safety Act 2023 vs Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law2 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law2 mappingsIAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) vs Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law2 mappingsBIMCO Cyber Security vs Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law2 mappingsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) vs Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation and Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law?

Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation has 28 controls across its framework, while Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 1 — Preliminary, where 10 Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls have no direct Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law equivalent.

How many controls map between Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation and Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law?

Of 28 total Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls, 1 map directly to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law?

28 Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls have no direct equivalent in Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 1 — Preliminary with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation and Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 1 — Preliminary (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.