Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token RegulationvsMiFID II / MiFIR
See exactly how Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls map to MiFID II / MiFIR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation maps to MiFID II / MiFIR with 50% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 1 — Preliminary.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Part 1 — Preliminary(9 mappings)
Part 3 — Conduct of Business(10 mappings)
Part 4 — Directions, Inspections and Investigations(1 mappings)
+19 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation comparisons
Other MiFID II / MiFIR comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation and MiFID II / MiFIR?
Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation has 28 controls across its framework, while MiFID II / MiFIR covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 1 — Preliminary, where 6 Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls have no direct MiFID II / MiFIR equivalent.
How many controls map between Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation and MiFID II / MiFIR?
Of 28 total Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls, 15 map directly to MiFID II / MiFIR controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation to MiFID II / MiFIR?
14 Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls have no direct equivalent in MiFID II / MiFIR. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 1 — Preliminary with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation and MiFID II / MiFIR?
The domain with the highest gap count is Part 1 — Preliminary (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.